There is much talk of Hydrogen engines and other things new. These may hold future promise, but it must be remembered that the starting point of current haulage is in exsistance. Total replacement of transport instantaniously would cost too much and leave a backlog of orders for vihicles, and lots of un-moved beans, which as we all know is how a comercial famine can start. So the technologies on this page are split into modification, new and technology on other pages. All technology on this page is considered public domain, and please note that links from this page do not imply the page you go to is in anyway public domain.
The first technology I have theoretically invented is called the Oxygen Seperation Turbo. The principal is that if you ionize the inlet air to the turbo at less than 20% ionization (most likely), then oxygen being more electronegative than nitrogen, would be majorly ionized, and the nitrogen would be minorly ionized. Now ions will rotate in a magnetic field, so a turbo charger with a magnetic field placed along it would keep the oxygen in the spining circle and the nitrogen would seperate towards the edge. If the edge nitrogen was bled from the turbo and wasted via a bernoulli pipe down the exhaust, then the following effects would occur. The oxygen inlet percentage would increase. The turbine differential pressure would increase, increasing spin speed. The ionized oxygen would react more with the fuel used, meaning less fuel would be needed for the same bang. This technology would work well with turbo internal combustion engines, oil or gas turbines or jet engines with the excess nitrogen giving a turbo prop effect.
I understand that there is a French site that has a Bubbler design on it which has a free non comercial licence. (Google: Bingo Fuel Free Energy). The basic design relies on the realization that 16g of water just below 100 C expands to about 100 litres at just above 100 C at atmospheric pressure. So small amounts of heated water condensed droplets in the inlet.boost the expansion for an amount of fuel burned. Reports of 80% savings in fuel have been common. After thinking about this technology for a while, I think the following improvements could be made. If the evaporation to the inlet is seperated from the evapouration to the exhaust (this is done by a splitter in the current method, and has to be done somehow as the exhaust volume is larger than the inlet volume), then an efficiency improvement can be made. The evaporation to inlet pipe is placed inside (concentric) the exhaust evapouration pipe, and extends out both ends. The end that is inside the bubbler tank is extended to go under the water in the bubbler tank. This has the effect that each impulse of exhaust from the cylinder block pushes the bubbler tank water down, and so the evaporation pipe to the inlet has a pulse of uprising water in it which is hydrolically higher. The top of the evapouration to the inlet pipe is resrticted to cause the pressure inside the pipe to be very high when the uprising water is at maximum height. This has the effect of cooling the lower part of the evapouration to inlet pipe, and so condenses, most of the water vapour in the surrounding evapouration to exhaust pipe. As a result, less water is lost to the air. A further consequence, is that the top of the evapouration to the inlet pipe becomes super heated, and can function as a high pressure diesel fuel line heater, or a petrol vapouriser. Note that oxygen ions from the above oxygen seperating turbo, would be quite dangerous to carbourate with petrol vapour. DON'T PISS ABOUT.
There is also quite a few designs for hydrogen electrolysis cells on the internet. The principal is to use high frequency PWM DC to split the water at a lower energy than constant DC electrolysis. Some peolple say this is impossible, but a possible mode of operation is that the water is made to resonate at the microwave frequency of 2.4GHz (wavelength adjusted for the speed of light in water), and so the molecules of water only have to gain a tiny extra pice of energy to split. Another mode of action could be that the water molecules have an energy Boltzmann distribution made by the pulse field chaos, and at some energies the water splits easier, The resulting depeleted distribution refills the vacated energy levels by statistical entropy, and so water seperation is achived at a lower potential. However it works, the fact is the water is seperated at some energy. The evaporation to inlet pipe of the modified bubbler design above, could have the negative electrode place down the centre of it to produce hydrogen, as well as steam, from the bubbler tank. The positive electrode which generates oxygen could be within the tank, or within the same pipe as the negative electrode. If it is within the same pipe, then a explosive fuel mix is fed into the inlet, stabalized by the steam. If it within the tank, then the cleaned exhaust gas is high in oxygen, allowing a better exhaust gas recycling principal, by oxygen seperation. Hydrogen is dangerous, as before, DON'T PISS ABOUT.
The limits of bubbler design is being explorered by many people, and I think one of the main limits is the particulate build up inside the bubbler tank. Maybe if the oxygen is released into the tank, it can be used to oxidize the particulates. Shorter penitration into the water of the positive oxygen electrode, causes an increase in electrical flux density, and a resulting oxygen plasma electrode maybe just what is needed.
Of the newest technologies I think the pricipal that the air resistance is taken into the force balance of an object moving in an inertial frame of rest is most important. If 3 spinning weights ar place within a circular track, and ball races were used to reduce friction, then electromotive control fields could be produced around the circular track to accelerate and decelerate the weights so the front and rear speed is different.The acceleration and the deceleration power consumption cancels due to regenerative braking. The centrofugal impulse between front and back of the circle is exactly balanced by wind resistance, for constant velocity inertial motion for extream efficiency. Why circular UFOs?
The limits of inertial engines as they are know are probably not being investigated by the non exsistant area 51, and use of deadly force is authorized so don't say you have not been warned.
J. Naudin - Interesting Energy Site